lesion.io Blog
  • Roadmap
  • Docs
    • Templates
      • Data Inventory
      • Access Control
      • Cybersecurity Roles & Responsibilities
      • Asset Inventory
      • Acceptable Use Policy
      • Change Management
      • Vendor Risk Assessment Form
      • Password Protection Policy
  • About Us
    • Manifesto
    • Metrics
  • CTF Team
    • CISA ICS CTF 2024
      • Virbank
        • Mission: Inconceivable - 1
        • Mission: Inconceivable - 2
        • Extend Your Stay - 1
        • Extend Your Stay - 2
        • Extend Your Stay - 3
        • Extend Your Stay - 4
        • Follow The Charts - 1
        • Follow The Charts - 2
        • Read Askew Manuscripts - 1
        • Read Askew Manuscripts - 2
        • Read Askew Manuscripts - 3
        • Read Askew Manuscripts - 4
        • Read Askew Manuscripts - 5
      • Anville
        • Genisys of the Problems - 1
        • Genisys of the Problems - 2
        • Genisys of the Problems - 3
        • Modeling Trains - 1
        • Modeling Trains - 2
        • Modeling Trains - 3
      • Castelia
        • Page
      • Driftviel
        • Page 1
Powered by GitBook
On this page
  • Severity Ratings (0-4000)
  • Grading System (0-4000)

Was this helpful?

  1. About Us

Metrics

Severity Ratings (0-4000)

1. Critical

  • Range: 3200 to 4000

  • Explanation: Represents the most severe issues that could have a significant impact on the organization, requiring immediate attention and remediation.

2. High

  • Range: 2400 to 3199

  • Explanation: Indicates significant issues that could potentially cause serious damage or disruption if not addressed promptly.

3. Medium

  • Range: 1600 to 2399

  • Explanation: Reflects moderate issues that should be addressed in a timely manner but may not pose an immediate risk.

4. Low

  • Range: 0 to 1599

  • Explanation: Represents less severe issues that have a minimal impact and can be addressed at a more convenient time.

Grading System (0-4000)

1. S (Superior)

  • Range: 0 to 499

  • Explanation: Excellent performance or security posture, with minimal issues or vulnerabilities.

2. A (Excellent)

  • Range: 500 to 999

  • Explanation: Very good performance or security posture, with only minor issues or vulnerabilities.

3. B (Good)

  • Range: 1000 to 1499

  • Explanation: Good performance or security posture, with some issues that need addressing but generally under control.

4. C (Average)

  • Range: 1500 to 1999

  • Explanation: Average performance or security posture, with a moderate number of issues that need attention.

5. D (Below Average)

  • Range: 2000 to 2499

  • Explanation: Below average performance or security posture, with several issues that need to be addressed urgently.

6. E (Poor)

  • Range: 2500 to 2999

  • Explanation: Poor performance or security posture, with many significant issues that require immediate action.

7. F (Failing)

  • Range: 3000 to 4000

  • Explanation: Failing performance or security posture, with critical issues that need immediate remediation to prevent severe consequences.

This setup allows you to classify severity and performance levels effectively within a 0-4000 range, facilitating a clear understanding of risk levels and necessary actions.

PreviousManifestoNextCTF Team

Last updated 10 months ago

Was this helpful?